
March 31, 2026 edit:
Today is the last day before the Terraform Cloud free tier goes away!
Edited Feb 19, 2026 to add the following:
Some additional details have been posted on the TFC pricing page, which has Essentials at $0.10 per resource per month, Standard at $0.47, and Premium at $0.99.
Previously, pricing for Premium was listed as "contact sales". Concurrency is respectively limited at 3 for Essentials, 10 for Standard, and up to 200 for Premium, compared with Scalr which provides unlimited concurrency at no extra charge, and is a drop-in replacement for Terraform Cloud.
Edited Jan 5, 2026 to add the following:
The terraform import command for onboarding existing infrastructure seems to have been restricted to the "Business Tier," removing it from Free and Standard tiers, according to this source.
Edited Dec 18, 2025 to add the following clarification:
Hashicorp has clarified that what's being sunset is their user-based free tier, in favor of their pay-as-you-go plan that has a small free tier (of 500 managed resources). While you get unlimited users, SSO, and policy-as-code, there's not much you can do under 500 resources. For real infrastructure—a single EKS cluster with networking, IAM, security groups, and add-ons consume that fast.
We'll continue to update this post with info as it comes in.
On December 15, 2025, HashiCorp sent an email to all HCP Terraform Free tier customers with news that caught many off guard: the "legacy HCP Terraform Free plan" will reach end-of-life on March 31, 2026. If you're one of the affected users, here's everything we know—and don't know—about what comes next.
HashiCorp's email to Free tier users was brief and direct:
"We're reaching out to let you know that your organization is currently on the legacy HCP Terraform Free plan. This plan will reach end-of-life (EOL) on March 31, 2026. After this date, the plan will no longer be supported. To keep using your organization without interruption, please sign up for a current HCP Terraform plan and migrate your existing organization before March 31, 2026."
Here's what we can confirm:
The Free tier being discontinued offered up to 500 managed resources, 1 concurrent run, basic Sentinel/OPA policy enforcement (1 policy set, 1 mandatory policy), and 1 self-hosted agent. For small teams and individual practitioners, it was a viable way to use Terraform Cloud without cost.
HashiCorp's email raised more questions than it answered. Several critical details remain unclear:
What happens to accounts that don't upgrade? The email says the plan will "no longer be supported," but doesn't specify whether:
What happens to state data? This is the biggest concern. According to HashiCorp's own documentation, workspace deletion is unrecoverable and results in permanent loss of state files. If you're managing production infrastructure through HCP Terraform Free, losing access to your state could leave resources orphaned—still running in your cloud account but no longer manageable through Terraform.
Will there be a migration path? HashiCorp hasn't published:
terraform state pullWhy "legacy" Free tier? The email refers to the "legacy HCP Terraform Free plan," suggesting there may be a distinction between older accounts and newer ones. Whether this means anything in practice remains unclear—HashiCorp hasn't explained the terminology.
We recommend affected users take immediate action to export state files and document configurations rather than waiting for clarification that may not come.
This announcement doesn't exist in isolation. It's part of a clear pattern of restrictions that has accelerated since IBM's acquisition of HashiCorp closed in late 2024:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| June 2023 | HashiCorp introduces Resources Under Management (RUM) pricing model. Free tier expanded to 500 resources with premium features. HashiCorp claims this will accommodate "more than 90% of practitioners." |
| August 2023 | Terraform license changes from Mozilla Public License to Business Source License (BSL 1.1). OpenTofu fork announced within days. |
| April 2024 | IBM announces $6.4 billion acquisition of HashiCorp. |
| Late 2024 | IBM acquisition closes. HashiCorp operates as IBM Software division. |
| January 2025 | Stealth feature restrictions: terraform import locked behind Business tier. State command limitations introduced. No press release—changes discovered through broken workflows and documentation updates. |
| December 10, 2025 | CDKTF (Cloud Development Kit for Terraform) deprecation announced, ending support for external programming languages. |
| December 15, 2025 | Free tier EOL announced via email. No accompanying blog post or documentation. |
The pattern is consistent: features that were once freely available are being systematically moved behind paywalls, often with minimal notice and no public announcement.
For teams evaluating their long-term infrastructure automation strategy, this trajectory is worth considering. The question isn't just "what does HCP Terraform cost today?" but "what will it cost—and what will be restricted—next year?"
If you're looking to move off HCP Terraform, several commercial platforms offer Terraform and OpenTofu automation. Here's how they compare across the factors that matter most for migration.
Moving from HCP Terraform to another platform involves several steps:
terraform state pull) and configure your new backendPlatform-specific migration considerations:
Note that all of these include support for OPA policies, OpenTofu, and GitOps.
| Platform | Migration Path |
|---|---|
| Scalr | Drop-in replacement for Terraform Cloud. Migration script imports all resources. |
| Spacelift | State import supported, provides migration documentation for TFC customers. Stacks concept differs from workspaces—some restructuring may be needed. |
| env0 | Offers explicit TFC migration tools. Deployment-based model means rethinking how you organize workspaces. |
Most migrations can be completed in minutes to weeks depending on complexity. The biggest variable is how heavily you've invested in Sentinel policies (which aren't portable across platforms), although there are many tools to auto-convert them into OPA.
This is where the differences become significant. HCP Terraform's RUM (Resources Under Management) model charges per resource per hour, which scales non-linearly as infrastructure grows.
HCP Terraform pricing (current):
What this means in practice:
| Managed Resources | Monthly Cost (Standard) | Annual Cost |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | ~$350 | ~$4,200 |
| 5,000 | ~$2,450 | ~$29,400 |
| 10,000 | ~$10,200 | ~$122,400 |
Remember: every security group rule, IAM policy, S3 lifecycle configuration counts as a resource. Teams frequently discover their actual resource count is 30-50% higher than expected.
Alternative pricing models:
| Platform | Model | Starting Point | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalr | Per-run | 50 free runs/month, then ~$0.99/run | No resource limits. All features included in free tier. Cost scales with activity, not infrastructure size. |
| Spacelift | Concurrency-based | ~$399/month | Unlimited deployments. Cost based on parallelism, not resources. |
| env0 | Deployments + run minutes | Free: 3 users, 50 deployments, 500 min | Unlimited concurrent runs on paid plans. |
For teams with large infrastructure but moderate deployment frequency, per-run or concurrency-based models often cost significantly less than RUM pricing.
Moving platforms isn't just about escaping restrictions—it's an opportunity to gain capabilities HCP Terraform doesn't offer:
Scalr
Spacelift
env0
Across all platforms:
If you'd rather not depend on another SaaS platform, several self-hosted and open source options exist:
What it is: Open source Terraform pull request automation. Runs plan and apply based on GitHub/GitLab comments.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Teams comfortable with GitOps, already running Kubernetes or similar infrastructure, and wanting zero vendor lock-in.
What it is: Run OpenTofu (the open source Terraform fork) in your own CI/CD system with cloud-based state storage.
Typical setup:
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Platform engineering teams with bandwidth to build and maintain internal tooling.
What it is: Open source orchestration tool for Terraform/OpenTofu. Handles code generation, stack management, and execution across many directories.
Pros:
Cons:
Best for: Teams with complex Terraform monorepos looking for better orchestration without a full platform.
| Solution | Cost | Setup Effort | Governance | State Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantis | Free | Medium | Limited | BYO (S3, etc.) |
| OpenTofu + CI/CD | Free | High | DIY | BYO |
| Terramate | Free | Medium | DIY | BYO |
| Commercial platform | Varies | Low | Built-in | Managed |
If you’re evaluating your options, we’ve compared every major Terraform Cloud alternative side by side in our guide to selecting a Terraform Cloud alternative.
For a step-by-step migration path, see our complete migration guide covering Scalr, Spacelift, and self-hosted options.
If you're on HCP Terraform Free, run one of the many scripts that will estimate your costs on an HCP paid plan, then book a demo with any of the many alternatives or get a quote to compare costs.
Have questions about migrating from HCP Terraform? We're happy to help—reach out to our team or check out our migration guide.
